It is important to investigate various topics (review of literature) or issues in order improve one's own instruction in the classroom. Reviewing what research shows us may discourage a teacher from trying a method that has been found to be ineffective. In other words, it may save someone from trying something that has not been shown to improve achievement. The article goes on to review what three teachers did within their classrooms to help with math instruction. The three projects are listed below.
- subtraction error patterns
- multiplication facts and flashcards
- physical activity and math learning
I stumbled upon this article last year when looking in this journal but thought it was a great one to reread and reassure myself of my experiences with action research. We spent countless hours reviewing literature on our topics or issues.We became better informed and knowledgeable about out issues. I felt that it was beneficial in that in helped me establish a direction and idea in where I needed to go to help students improve with addition fluency. I did not know how things would turn out but I definitely have experienced success with helping students improve their abilities to recall math facts. Was it the most efficient method? Probably not. But I know that my students enjoyed it, and more importantly showed significant gains from pretest to posttest.
What are your thoughts on the action research process? Do you think that educators should make it a part of professional development opportunities?
March 2011 - click here to view online edition of Teaching Children Mathematics
March 2011, Volume 17, Issue 7, Page 398
No comments:
Post a Comment